News

Date of Event: Thursday, September 30th 2021

Time of Event: 9:30 AM — 1:00 PM

According to Home Office estimates, Serious and Organised Crime (SOC) costs the UK more than £37 billion per year and includes drug trafficking, human trafficking, organised illegal immigration, high value crimes, organised acquisitive crime and cybercrime. Following the National Crime Agency’s (NCA) 2021 National Strategic Assessment of SOC, two worrying trends can be identified. Firstly, most decreasing offending can be directly attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures; secondly, cybercrime and other online criminal activities are on the rise.

From 2020-21, the NCA’s estimate of individuals engaged in SOC surged from 50,000 to 70,000. Crimes that did actually decrease over this period, such as firearms violence and other forms of physical harm, are expected to return to pre-pandemic levels after lockdown lifts, continuing its upward trend from 2013 to 2019. The increase in drug use during the pandemic also led to the continual expansion of the drug network, exacerbating existing SOCs like county line drug trade and, worse, human trafficking. According to Unseen, criminal exploitation rose by 42% in 2020, and drug-trafficking remains to be one of the most prevalent types of exploitation. As communications technology continues to advance at an unprecedented pace, SOCs and other criminal activities must be reconsidered at an international and digital level. The scale of the recent ANOM arrests should be a testament to the complexity of modern criminal networks.

In response to these challenges, the UK government has introduced several bills this year. The Policing, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill 2021 mandates cross-county cooperation with its ‘Serious Violence partnership’ to detect and investigate organised violent crimes, whereas the Covert human intelligence sources (CHIS) Bill 2021 grants law enforcement Undercover operatives (UCOs) more powers in infiltration campaigns. These attempts to root out the causes and operating capacity of criminal groups are continuations of the “whole system” approach outlined in the 2018 updated Serious and Organised Crime Strategy. On a local level, London mayor Sadiq Khan has invested to expand the Metropolitan Police force and pledges to focus on preventive measures such as the existing DIVERT intervention programme and the Violent Crime Task Force (VCTF). In recent years, there has also been an increase in cooperation between local authorities and community groups (Hackney Gang Intervention Project and Southwark’s SERVE programme). Other enforcement measures, such as police presence in public spaces and the use of stop and search, are similarly strengthened.

However, organisations such as FairTrials and the Criminal Justice Alliance (CJA) have warned that the 2021 Policing Bill might further disadvantage minorities in the criminal justice system, who are already grossly overrepresented. Labour traces this stagnation in tackling SOC to the government’s lacklustre community preventive measures. Moreover, the role of education, youth and prison authorities in the new Serious Violence Partnership scheme remains vague and requires clarity. On the privacy front, the adoption of new technology to tackle violent crimes, including the controversial ANOM infiltration or London Met’s introduction of Neoface, has received myriads of pushback from privacy and human rights groups. The problem is compounded by other factors such as shifting UK-EU relations and economic recovery after the pandemic, which renders the UK more vulnerable to SOCs than at any time in recent history. 

In light of these developments, this timely symposium will offer police officers, community safety partnerships, local safeguarding boards and other key stakeholders, with a timely and invaluable opportunity to exchange ideas, share best practice and develop innovative strategies to effectively respond to the growing risks associated with Serious and Organised Crime.

Program

• Review the state of Serious and Organised Crimes (SOCs) in the UK and responses by the government
• Understand the effects of Covid-19 and Brexit on criminal activity in the UK
• Analyse the effectiveness of the UK government’s current strategies and methods in tackling violent SOCs
• Examine the role of local community groups and the private sector in tackling SOCs
• Rethink financial and economic crimes in the context of a “Whole-System Approach” to SOCs
• Discuss the concerns of privacy and surveillance raised by the general public
• Identify key priorities for future national strategies
• Evaluate new technologies and innovations that can effectively address SOCs

Who Should Attend?

• Regional Organised Crime Units
• Serious and Organised Crime Local Partnerships
• Police Service
• Police and Crime Commissioners
• Serious and Organised Crime Officers and Advisers
• Community Safety Partnerships
• Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships
• Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hubs
• Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferences
• Offender Management Services
• Fraud Prevention Teams
• Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Teams
• E-crime Teams
• Local Criminal Justice Boards
• Prison and Probation Services
• Crown Prosecution Service
• Criminal Justice Practitioners
• Victim Support Services
• Victim Care/Advocacy Organisations
• Neighbourhood Policing Teams
• Youth Offending Teams
• Youth Justice Boards
• Health and Wellbeing Board
• Local Safeguarding Boards
• Immigration Enforcement Teams
• Human Trafficking Teams
• Troubled Families Teams
• Local Safeguarding Children Boards
• Community Cohesion Officers
• Community Engagement Officers
• Third Sector Practitioners
• Academics, Analysts and Researchers

REGISTER YOUR PLACE

Report

Summary

The current study evaluated the system-wide implementation of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) across British Columbia (BC)’s Community Corrections Division. STICS was developed by researchers from Public Safety Canada to train community supervision officers (POs) to better apply the principles of effective offender rehabilitation known to reduce recidivism with their clients. These principles include delivering more intensive interventions to higher risk offenders (risk principle), targeting criminogenic needs (need principle), and delivering interventions in a way that matches the offender’s abilities, motivations, and learning style, mostly using cognitive-behavioural techniques (responsivity principle). This study examined the extent to which STICS training had an impact on POs’ supervision practices and client recidivism.

Several key findings were identified: 

• Consistent with the goals of STICS training, trained POs spent a greater proportion of their sessions on criminogenic needs, especially procriminal attitudes/cognitions. Additionally, POs engaged in more and higher quality cognitive-behavioural interventions after training. 
• Overall, clients of STICS-trained POs had a significantly lower 2-year reconviction rate than those who were supervised prior to STICS training. At two years, 43.0% of STICS clients had any new criminal conviction (14.9% with a violent reconviction), whereas the rate for the non-STICS clients was 61.4% (21.2% with a violent reconviction). 

Date of Event: Tuesday, October 5th 2021

Time of Event: 9:30 AM — 1:00 PM

Place of Event: Webinar

Key Speakers

REGISTER YOUR PLACE

Overview

Knife crime is at its highest recorded level in the past 10 years, with 46,000 offences involving a knife or sharp instrument in England and Wales in the year ending March 2020. During the COVID-19 lockdown period, police have recorded rises in knife crime and youth violence throughout many parts of the UK. Of further concern is that in 2020, the number of ‘children in need’ assessments that identified gangs as a factor increased by 34%. 

In an effort to combat this sharp rise in knife crime, on 4 February 2021, the government published a total police funding settlement of up to £15.8 billion in 2021/22, an increase of up to £636 million compared to 2020/21. The government have also introduced the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill in March this year, seeking to increase minimum sentencing for certain offences, introduce provisions for the management of offenders, including new targeted stop and search powers for the police targeting knife crime offenders. In particular, Serious Violence Reduction Orders (SVROs) aim to implement the government’s manifesto commitment to target known knife carriers, making it easier for officers to stop and search those previously convicted of a knife crime. This seeks to help the police target those most at risk of being drawn into serious violence, deter offenders from carrying weapons, and “set them on a more positive path” (Home Office, 2021). 

While there has been growing cross-party consensus supporting early intervention projects and treating knife crime as a public health problem, the British Youth Council have criticised the government’s recent effort to combat knife crime as a “punitive approach”. The decision to address knife crime primarily with hard powers has also led Kevin Blowe of the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) to argue that the proposals risk “creating a class of people who are treated as ‘permanent criminals’ – or who are regularly misidentified as such”. Critics of the the Bill suggest that tackling knife crime from a public health or social problem has been replaced by a tougher criminal stance. 

Furthermore, campaign groups such as Liberty Human Rights have highlighted concerns that communities of colour are already searched at significantly higher rates, with black people 8.9 times more likely to be subject to a stop and search than their white peers. The Home Office itself has conceded that a disproportionate number of black males will be impacted by SVROs, however little effort has been made to remedy this, with the Home Secretary stating that “the government’s number one job is to keep our people safe”. Criticism of this approach is supported by the British Youth Council, who have urged a roll back of stop and search powers “until the disproportionate targeting of black males has been addressed”. Campaigners argue that long-term studies, including one of Metropolitan Police data, show that stop and search has only a marginal impact on crime reduction.

Bernado’s have also raised concerns for the ‘hidden’ children of the pandemic who may be more vulnerable to exploitation. They have called for the Bill to be amended to introduce a statutory definition of ‘criminal exploitation’ to help identify victims and make sure they are supported appropriately. 

In reflection of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill and increase in funding programmes to tackle knife-crime, this symposium offers an insightful opportunity for practitioners across the police service, education, health and third sector to examine the Government’s latest strategies to tackle serious youth crime, share best practice and consider the next steps in confronting knife crime, to reduce the level of violence on our streets. Delegates will also explore how to implement a coordinated early intervention approach to identify those most vulnerable; divert young people away from crime and build more positive futures.

Program

• Assess the impact of Covid-19 on the spread of knife crime and the increasing number of vulnerable young people being exploited as a result
• Consider how to better identify and support children and young people at risk of committing a knife-related crime
• Discuss alternative ways to make communities safer, such as that from a public health perspective, or more innovative early intervention solutions
• Examine concerns with the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, and whether it will succeed in its aim of tackling knife crime
• Consider the impact that an increase in police stop and search powers will have on relationships between the public and police
• Discuss whether the government’s strategy addresses the root causes of knife crime and develop an understanding of what a long-term strategy may look like
• Explore collaborative opportunities and discuss better preventative measures

Who Should Attend?

• Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships
• Community Safety Teams
• Community Rehabilitation Companies
• Probation Officers
• Welfare Officers
• Neighbourhood Policing Teams
• Anti-Social Behaviour Coordinators
• Drug and Alcohol Action Teams
• Police Service, Police Authorities and Fire Services
• Firearms Units
• Youth Offending Teams
• Youth and Outreach Workers
• Youth Inclusion Team from Young Offenders Institutes
• Integrated Offender Management Units
• Community Cohesion and Development Organisations
• Community Support Officers
• Accident and Emergency Departments
• Local Authority Officers and Councillors
• Central Government Departments and Agencies
• Children and Youth Services
• Domestic Violence Co-ordinators
• Families Services Officers
• Sure Start, Children’s Trusts and Children’s Centres
• Health Service Professionals
• Victim Support Representatives
• Psychologists
• Social Workers and Social Services Officers
• Local Education Welfare Authorities
• Teachers and Head Teachers
• Neighbourhood Wardens and Co-ordinators
• Criminal Justice Practitioners
• Judges and Magistrates
• Legal Professionals
• Equality and Diversity Practitioners
• Third Sector Practitioners
• Academics and Researchers

REGISTER YOUR PLACE

High-volume live streaming offenders were likely to:

• make frequent transactions of small monetary value, typically less than $55, at intervals of less than 20 days
• have a limited criminal history, featuring few violent offences
• begin non-sexual offending later in life.

Read: Predicting prolific live streaming of child sexual abuse

• Police officers were more likely than community members to view cybercrime as a serious offence.
• There were notable differences between the two groups in their knowledge of how cybercrime affects policing—police officers were more likely to note the considerable effect of the changing cybercrime landscape.
• Members of the community were more confident in the ability of the police to address cybercrime than were the police officers surveyed.

Read: Responding to cybercrime: Results of a comparison between community members and police personnel

Copyright © 2021 Australian Institute of Criminology, All rights reserved.

https://www.aic.gov.au/privacy

28 September 2021, 14:00 - 15:00 CET

Against the backdrop of the global COVID-19 pandemic, alarming reports also signalled a growing problem inside our European homes. While COVID-19 protection measures tried to lock out the virus, they also locked in many victims of domestic violence with their abusers. The Portuguese Presidency of our Network accurately recognised this aggravated situation, which is why our upcoming toolbox focuses on domestic violence and intimate partner homicides.

This webinar (and the relating toolbox) will highlight two specific aspects to practitioners and policymakers working in the field of domestic violence:

1. The need for targeted and tailored approaches - domestic violence is often treated as a single phenomenon, yet we can identify different types.
2. Perpetrator programmes - these programmes work with violent men and aim to raise the sense of responsibility and accountability for their behaviour. These programmes ensure the victim's safety by disrupting the current violence, but also help perpetrators change their violent behaviour.

Participation is free but registration is mandatory. The access link will be sent prior to the webinar. The toolbox will be published after the webinar.