June 15-17, 2017
A preliminary copy of the Annual Meeting program is now available. 2017 will see a new UN Secretary-General taking office on the 38th Floor at UN Headquarters, following the end of Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s second term. The new SG will be faced with a number of ongoing global, regional and other challenges, and will be confronted with new issues that will arise over time. The SG also will have the job of continuing to build on the momentum of recent milestone agreements, including the Sustainable Development Goals, the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, and the Commitments to Action from the World Humanitarian Summit. While the transition in the leadership of the United Nations is likely to be a central interest for many ACUNS members, the 2017 Annual Meeting notably also marks the 30th anniversary of the founding of the Academic Council. This year’s meeting, therefore, will offer a relatively rare opportunity for members—that is, a moment to reflect on the achievements of one Secretary-General and to consider the agenda of the new leader of the global body, while connecting those reflections to discussions of the role of ACUNS and its members in promoting innovative scholarship and greater understanding of the UN system and its place in meeting global governance. This is the first ACUNS meeting to be held in East Asia, or in Asia broadly. We will be working with colleagues of the Korean Academic Council on the United Nations System (KACUNS) in Seoul, Korea, to reach out to UN studies associations, institutions and individuals in the region. We very much welcome this as an important bridge-building initiative; thus we will look for scholarly papers that might identify and engage regional as well as global topics including but not limited to the promotion and protection of human rights; the challenges of peace and development; supporting global civil education; the dynamics of relations amongst Asian states on issues of human rights, peace and development, and how these take shape within the UN framework—including the possibility of peaceful reunification; the evolving roles of regional bodies, non-government organizations, civil society and the private sector; as well as shifts in relations between the region and external actors. The ACUNS Annual Meeting also is being held in cooperation with the Human Rights section of the International Studies Association (ISA). We are pleased to encourage HR section members to submit Workshop paper and panel proposals, and to register to attend the Meeting. Proposals on the Annual Meeting theme—“Revitalizing the United Nations for Human Rights, Peace and Development”—and on the subthemes and issues raised in this introductory note, in addition to other topics relating to the UN system and the broader mandate of the Council, will be considered
CoCoRa is a two-year European project, co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Commission, aiming to develop and test a new community-based prevention strategy against radicalisation towards violent and militant extremism among young people
Migrant smuggling has become the fastest growing criminal sector - to tackle this Europol have brought together some of the best investigators in Europe. This report looks at the evolution of migrant smuggling and the development of the European Migrant Smuggling Centre in 2016.
Heather M. Kleider-Offutt, Leslie R. Knuycky, Amanda M. Clevinger, Megan M. Capodanno
Eyewitness misidentification is the leading cause of wrongful convictions, and Black men, more than other racial groups, are affected by this memory error. A subgroup of Black men who have stereotypically Black features (dark skin, wide lips, and nose) are associated with the criminal-Black-man stereotype more than their atypical counterparts. This perception of criminality leads to harsh sentencing and misidentification from line-ups in laboratory studies. In this study, we investigated whether face-type biases that lead to misidentifications in the laboratory extend to real-world cases.
Method
Participants rated the face stereotypicality of Black men exonerated by the Innocence Project (IP) with DNA evidence, who were incarcerated due to eyewitness misidentification (IP eyewitness) and for non-misidentification reasons (IP other).
Results
Higher stereotypicality-face ratings were given to IP eyewitness exonerates than to IP other exonerates regardless of participant race. Moreover, the face ratings were unrelated to the race of the eyewitness in the actual case (i.e., cross-race, same race), suggesting that cross-race misidentification was not associated with higher stereotypicality ratings of the IP eyewitness exonerates.
Conclusions
These findings are consistent with extant laboratory research wherein Black men with stereotypical facial features are at increased risk for eyewitness misidentification and that face-type biases extend beyond cross-race judgements. These results further highlight the risk of face-type judgements in misidentifications that potentially contribute to error in real-world cases.