Need Help? Contact us via phone or e-mail. Your Feedback
login / join us
×
login
e-mail:
password:

News

UNGASS 2016: Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly on the world drug problem

Organizational arrangements The General Assembly will convene a special session on the world drug problem from 19 to 21 April 2016 at UN Headquarters in New York, in accordance with its resolutions 67/193 of 20 December 2012, 69/200 of 18 December 2014 and 70/181 of 17 December 2015. [Information on organizational arrangements

Register for Webinar: Responding to the Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program Grant Solicitation

Hosted by The Council of State Governments Justice Center with funding support from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance Date: Wednesday, April 13 Time: 2–3:30 p.m. ET In this webinar, officials from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance and The Council of State Governments Justice Center will explain the Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program (JMHCP) and its application process. JMHCP is designed to increase public safety and improve access to effective treatment for people with mental disorders involved with the criminal justice system by facilitating collaboration among the criminal justice, juvenile justice, mental health treatment, and substance use systems. Each grantee is given the opportunity to tailor their programming to respond best to the particular needs of their community.

Apply Now: Assessing the Impact of Juvenile Justice Reforms Program

The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is seeking applications for funding under its FY16 Assessing the Impact of Juvenile Justice Reforms Program. This program supports research and evaluations that measure the effectiveness and cost efficiency of juvenile justice system reforms. In particular, OJJDP is interested in measuring the impact of policy changes that have been enacted or implemented in states participating in OJJDP’s Smart on Juvenile Justice Initiative, as well as reforms in other states and local jurisdictions that are consistent with OJJDP’s vision for juvenile justice in which a youth’s contact with the system is rare, fair, and beneficial. OJJDP will prioritize proposals that aim to minimize formal juvenile justice system involvement and ensure that, when necessary, the system holds youth accountable in a manner that is fair, responsive to their individualized needs, and developmentally appropriate. Applications are due May 23

Springer: 100+ ground-breaking articles that have the potential to Change the World!

2015 was a year fraught with humanitarian and natural disasters: unprecedented rising temperatures, Ebola, the refugee crisis, economic instability – just to name a few. It was also a year marked by amazing acts of courage, kindness, and collaborations and contributions made by people and organizations from all facets of society, not least the scientific research community. We asked our editorial boards to pick one article from their journal, published in 2015, that addresses the world’s most pressing challenges. We were delighted to receive feedback from more than 100 journals and present to you ground-breaking articles that have the potential to Change the World! Read all 100+ ground-breaking articles chosen by Springer Editors-in-Chief: » Earth and Environmental Sciences » Life Sciences and Biomedicine » Medicine and Public Health » Social Sciences, Psychology, Education, Philosophy » Chemistry, Physics, Astronomy, Engineering, Materials » Business & Economics, Statistics, Mathematics, Computer Sciences Those articles which are already open access are freely available online on a permanent basis and all other articles have been made freely available until 15 July 2016.

UCL Jill Dando Institute Crime Analysis training course – still time to book your pla

Monday 11th - Thursday 14th April 2016 The UCL JDI Crime Analysis course offers the essential skills that an analyst requires to become pro-actively involved in information-driven, evidence-based, problem solving approaches to reducing crime, ASB and other community safety issues. The course is highly interactive, and is designed to improve an analyst’s awareness of data that are available across a range of agencies for analysis, extend their skills in analytical techniques, and build their confidence in ensuring that analysis is used to influence decision-making. The course is suitable for the analysis of all types of volume crime (e.g., burglary, violent crime, theft), serious crime (e.g., child sexual exploitation, sexual assaults), organised crime, cybercrime, road traffic accidents (e.g., bicycle collisions and cyclist fatalities) and all other types of incidents relating to crime and ASB (examples from previous courses have included counterfeit goods, illegal imports, youth cannabis use, repeat callers, and problem families). The course places great emphasis on helping analysts to develop good quality problem profiles and target profiles.

Center for Court Innovation: Trial and Error in Criminal Justice Reform: Learning from Failure

'Not Only A Good Read But A Must Read' Rowman & Littlefield has released a new edition of Trial & Error in Criminal Justice Reform: Learning from Failure, featuring an introduction by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. In Trial & Error in Criminal Justice Reform, Greg Berman and Aubrey Fox from the Center for Court Innovation take a hard look at the challenges of transforming our criminal justice system. They argue that the reluctance of policymakers to talk openly about failure has stunted the public conversation about crime and stifled new ideas. It has also contributed to our inability to address such problems as chronic offending in low-income neighborhoods, an overreliance on incarceration, and the misuse of pretrial detention. "The philosopher John Dewey once wrote that understanding things the way they are is the first step in making them different. This book tells us that understanding failure is the first step to creating a fairer and safer community for everyone," writes District Attorney Vance in a new introduction to the book. Writing in the Harvard Law Review, Joan Petersilia and Kathryne M. Young offered this praise for the book: "If we want today’s reform efforts to produce fundamental change, we would be well advised to heed Greg Berman and Aubrey Fox’s warnings in their award-winning book, Trial & Error in Criminal Justice Reform." According to New York Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, "Trial & Error in Criminal Justice Reform offers a valuable contribution to the debate about crime and what to do about it. It’s not only a good read but a must read."

Guidelines for prison and probation services regarding radicalisation and violent extremism

Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 March 2016, at the 1249th Meeting of the Ministers' Deputies

EUSPR: “Give me the money!”: how to ask for research funding

Pre-conference workshops 2016 - Seventh EUSPR Conference and Members’ Meeting, October 31st – November 2nd 2016, Berlin Full day workshop convened by Kimberley Hill and Angelina Brotherhood, The University of Northampton (UK); University of Vienna (AT) This workshop is intended for early careers participants and is free to attend. Being able to secure competitive funding is considered crucial in making the “metamorphosis” from “apprentice” to “independent researcher” (Laudel & Gläser 2008), and so should be a topic of key concern to any early-career prevention researcher. Yet early-career researchers may feel unsure where to look for funding or how to apply successfully. This workshop aims to address these questions from a practical and prevention orientated perspective. The workshop will include three parts: 1. A general overview of funding opportunities for research projects and researcher mobility in the early-career phase, including typical steps for preparing a grant application 2. Practical insights and advice offered by a diverse panel of prevention researchers based on their own experiences of applying for funding 3. Group work activities in which participants will review and discuss real-life examples of grant applications from the prevention field. Participants will have the opportunity to identify and obtain answers to those questions which are most relevant to them. Through its prevention orientation, the workshop should complement funding workshops that participants may already have access to through their own institutions. List of confirmed panellists and agenda will be added in due course. For any questions, please contact the facilitators below. Angelina Brotherhood is the current early-careers lead on the Board of the EUSPR. She is a doctoral researcher in sociology at the University of Vienna, Austria. Previously she worked at the Centre for Public Health at Liverpool John Moores University, UK, where she also worked on a number of EU co-funded projects. In case of any questions about this workshop, you can email her at a.brotherhood@ljmu.ac.uk.

Criminological Encounters is a new international, interdisciplinary and open-access journal that aims to facilitate critical dialogues between scholar

Issue 1: “Introducing Criminological Encounters” Criminological Encounters is a new international, interdisciplinary and open-access journal that aims to facilitate critical dialogues between scholars of criminology and our interlocutors in other social, academic, and professional domains about contemporary issues of crime, harm, violence, in/justice, security, law, and society. Criminology is famously described as a rendezvous discipline: a meeting place for the established disciplines of the social sciences and humanities, as well as the exact and natural sciences. At the same time criminology can be considered as a self-established, standalone discipline with transdiciplinary origins. The underdetermined character of criminology in these times of heightened sensitivities to issues of crime and in/security makes it a challenging but also exciting field of study. This journal understands criminology as a discipline of encounters: encounters both in the sense of constructive dialogues as well as confrontations around given subjects. These confrontations are at times intellectual in nature, and at others are more explicitly political. This journal also considers criminology as not only the science for the study and understanding of crime and its causes and consequences but also as a discipline that is dedicated to research on conflicts and other social issues from a holistic perspective.

The Recidivism of Homicide Offenders in Western Australia

Roderic Broadhurst Australian National University (ANU); Australian National University (ANU) - Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet) Ross Maller Australian National University (ANU) - School of Finance and Applied Statistics Max Maller Health Dept Western Australia, Data Linkage Brigitte Bouhours Australian National University (ANU) February 8, 2016 Abstract: Popular perceptions concerning the recidivism of extremely violent offenders - in particular, homicide offenders - are contradictory. Perceptions vary from one extreme - that such offenders rarely commit further violent offences - to the opposite end of the spectrum, where it is thought that they remain high risks on release from custody. The present study, the first of its kind in Australia, draws on the records of persons arrested in Western Australia over the period 1984-2005 to provide accurate measures of the recidivism of this small but potentially dangerous group, and to make rigorous comparisons between specific types of homicide offenders. Using survival analysis techniques, we accurately estimate and analyse the long-term rate of recidivism of 1,088 individuals arrested and charged for homicide in Western Australia between 1st January 1984 and 31st December 2005. The cases involve individuals arrested for domestic murders and other types of homicides (robbery and sexual murder), including attempted murder, conspiracy to murder, manslaughter (unintentional homicide) and driving causing death offences. Most arrests for homicide result in conviction and lengthy prison sentences; therefore, very long follow-up time is required to study the recidivism of such cases. Our database provides up to 22 years follow up time (for those arrested in 1984) and accounts critically for the first and any subsequent arrests, if they occur. Recidivism is defined herein as re-arrest following release from prison for the signal homicide offence within the period of follow-up, and is considered in three separate ways: as re-arrest for another homicide, for another violent offence, or for any offence. Using both nonparametric and parametric analyses we estimate probabilities of recidivism and the speed with which it occurs. Risks of recidivism are compared across types of homicide, and we explore the role of covariate information such as gender, age, Aboriginality, and prior record. Of the 1088 individuals, only 3 (all male non-Aboriginals) were subsequently arrested and charged with a distinct homicide offence relating to a single event in the follow-up period. But 40.3% were re-arrested for another offence (any offence) and 21.9% were re-arrested for another grave offence (robbery, blackmail and extortion, assault, sexual assault, abduction and other offences against the person, burglary, arson, child pornography and homicide) by the cutoff date. Accounting for censoring, among those committing a murder and subsequently released, we estimate a probability of 0.66 of being rearrested for another offence of any type. The corresponding probabilities for those convicted of manslaughter or for driving causing death were both 0.43. Having a prior record increased the risk of re-arrest substantially; for example, male non-Aboriginals arrested for murder with at least one prior arrest have an estimated probability of 0.72 of being rearrested for another offence of any type. Their estimated probability of being rearrested for another grave offence was 0.33. The results show that while homologous homicide re-offending is rare, homicide offenders, especially those who are charged with murder, have substantial risks of re-offending, and those who have prior arrest records have higher risks of re-offending for a grave offense. These findings should be of interest to courts and correctional agencies in assessing risk at various stages of the administration of criminal justice, and especially risk assessment for parole deliberations.

Study on the gender dimension of trafficking in human beings European Commission, 2016

European Commission, 2016, 240 pages The purpose of this study is to contribute to the identification and understanding of what it means to be ‘taking into account the gender perspective, to strengthen the prevention of this crime and protection of the victims thereof’, as required in Article 1 of European Union (EU Directive 2011/36/EU on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and Protecting its Victims in the context of the EU Strategy (COM(2012) 286 final) Towards the eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings. The study contributes to Priority E Action 2 of the Strategy, which states that ‘the Commission will develop knowledge on the gender dimensions of human trafficking, including the gender consequences of the various forms of trafficking and potential differences in the vulnerability of men and women to victimisation and its impact on them’. Its specific objectives and tasks are to address: the ‘gender dimension of vulnerability, recruitment, and victimisation’; ‘gender issues related to traffickers and to those creating demand’; and ‘an examination of law and policy responses on trafficking in human beings from a gender perspective’. This study, according to its terms of reference, aims to look specifically at the gender dimension of trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation. This follows evidence from statistical data from Eurostat, as well as data from The European Police Office (Europol) and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), according to which the most reported form of exploitation of victims is that of sexual exploitation and its strong gender dimension (96 % women and girls). It further addresses recommendations addressed in the Resolution of the European Parliament of 26 February 2014 on sexual exploitation and prostitution and its impact on gender equality (2013/2103(INI)) urging the European Commission to evaluate the impact that the European legal framework designed to eliminate trafficking for sexual exploitation has had to date and to undertake further research on patterns of prostitution, on human trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation and on the increased level of sex tourism in the EU, with particular reference to minors, and to promote the exchange of best practices among the Member States. The study is situated within the law and policy environment in the EU on anti-trafficking in human beings and on gender equality. This includes analysis of the gender dimension of each of the fields that are identified as priorities in the EU Strategy (COM(2012) 286 final) towards the eradication of trafficking in human beings (victim assistance, law enforcement, prevention by demand reduction, coherence and coordination, and knowledge and emerging concerns). The study uses reviews of relevant literature, in-depth case studies and high-level analysis in order to reach conclusions with regard to the gender dimensions of trafficking in human beings and make recommendations concerning law and policy implementation and improvement.

Webinar: Dealing with Radicalisation at Schools by Jesper Holme and Karin Heremans

The German Congress on Crime Prevention (GCOCP/DPT) and the Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) invite you to the following Webinar: Dealing with Radicalisation at Schools by Jesper Holme and Karin Heremans. Event to be held at the following time and date: Monday, April 18, 2016 from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM (CET)

Crime: measuring by ‘damage to victims’ will improve policing and public safety

New Cambridge ‘crime harm index’ published today quantifies true cost of crime: damage caused to victims and society. Experts call on UK government to adopt low-cost metric for greater transparency of crime trends and risks. Some UK forces have already used approach with early successes in identifying ‘harm spots’.

National Reentry Resource Center Center: Register Now for Webinar: Reentry Housing Options for Sex Offenders

Hosted by the National Reentry Resource Center Center with funding support from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance Date: Tuesday, April 19 Time: 2–3:30 p.m. ET Registered sex offenders face numerous barriers to finding stable housing when they return to the community from jail or prison. Improved housing stability reduces the likelihood of recidivism and makes it easier for registered sex offenders to comply with the terms of their parole or probation. However, creating transitional and permanent housing solutions for registered sex offenders often faces substantial push-back from communities, making it difficult to fund and operate these housing programs. In this webinar, presenters will: • Review the latest findings on the relationship between improved housing stability and reduced recidivism for registered sex offenders; • Share stories from two communities that have found effective solutions to housing registered sex offenders; and • Discuss the numerous barriers to developing housing options for registered sex offenders and strategies for overcoming them.

The Council of State Governments Justice Center:Save the Date: April 18–19, Livestream of National Stepping Up Summit

"In support of Stepping Up, the National Association of Counties (NACo), the Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center, and the American Psychiatric Association Foundation (APA Foundation) are hosting a National Summit on Reducing the Prevalence of Individuals with Mental Illnesses in Jails (National Summit). The Summit aims to help county, regional, tribal, or unified state teams develop and advance system-level plans to reduce the number of adults with mental illnesses and co-occurring substance use disorders in their jails. It will provide concrete strategies, resources, workshops, and networking opportunities with national experts and colleagues."

Reducing the Use of Jail

"Since 2014, the Center for Court Innovation has worked with the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation to help plan and launch the Safety + Justice Challenge, a national initiative to reduce the use of jail across the United States. The MacArthur Foundation today announced nearly $25 million worth of grants to support 20 jurisdictions in their local reform efforts. Going forward, the Center for Court Innovation will provide several of these jurisdictions with strategic advice and support as they implement their plans to shrink their local jail populations. This work grows out of the Center's 20 year history of creating meaningful jail alternatives in New York and providing technical assistance to jail reformers across the country and around the world. In addition to the Center for Court Innovation, several other leading criminal justice organizations will support the participants in the Safety + Justice Challenge, including the Institute for State and Local Governance, Justice Management Institute, Justice System Partners, Vera Institute of Justice, Pretrial Justice Institute, and W. Haywood Burns Institute."

Call for Practices: Prevention and fight against racism, xenophobia, homophobia and all other forms of intolerance

Efus and eight European organisations are launching a call to identify existing innovative and encouraging practices at a local level throughout Europe to combat crime and misdemeanors motivated by racism, xenophobia and all other forms of intolerance. 50 practices will be selected from the responses to this call, which will be published in a manual of practices and disseminated across Europe to promote local action and encourage authorities to take more action against intolerance. This call is part of the framework of the Just & Safer Cities for All Project, led by Efus and co-financed by the European Commission, whose primary objective is to strengthen the knowledge of stakeholders on the measures which can be taken at the local level against crime and offences linked to intolerance.

Launch of the project “Local Institutions Against Extremism II” (LIAISE 2) – Interested members can still join

Paris, March 2016 – Co-funded by the European Union, the project “Local Institutions Against Extremism II” (LIAISE 2) seeks to strengthen the capacities of local and regional European authorities to prevent and tackle the issue of radicalisation leading to violent extremism. LIAISE 2 gathers European cities and regions and develops cooperation throughout Europe within a dedicated network. This approach is in line with the alliance of European cities against violent extremism that was initiated jointly by Efus and the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe. Led by Efus, LIAISE 2 gathers 29 partner organisations in 10 countries, 18 cities and three regions, as well as four national Forums for urban security and three thematic non-governmental organisations: Alexandroupoli (GR), Augsburg (DE), Bagneux (FR), Bologna (IT), Bordeaux (FR), Brno (CZ)*, Brussels (BE), Düsseldorf (DE), Essen (DE), Generalitat de Catalunya (SP), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat (SP), Liege (BE), Malmö (SE), Montreuil (FR)*, Paris (FR), Reggio Emilia (IT), Rotterdam (NL)*, Sarcelles (FR), Setubal (PT), Toulouse (FR), the Belgian Forum for Prevention and Urban Security (FBPSU), the French Forum for Urban Security (FFSU), the Italian Forum for Urban Security (FISU), the German and European Forum for Urban Security (DEFUS), the Confederation of European Probation (CEP), the German association Ufuq, the State of Bavaria’s Ministry of Work, Social Affairs, Family and Integration (DE)*, the Ministry of the Interior of Bremen (DE)*, and the association Cultures Interactive (DE)*. Of a duration of 24 months, LIAISE 2 will organise five European conferences on different aspects of the issue of radicalisation. Furthermore, it will deliver training sessions to local authorities partner of the project and will help them to set up pilot projects in which they will apply locally the knowledge gained during the training sessions as well as develop innovative practices. LIAISE 2 will build on the results of the first LIAISE project, which was also co-funded by the EU. Initiated in 2014 by Efus with a group of nine cities from five European countries, LIAISE is working on a training programme and a guide for local authorities with the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a UK-based think tank specialised on extremism, and the German non-governmental organisation Ufuq, which works on intercultural dialogue

Prisons of the Future

On March 3rd and 4th the Final Conference Prisons of the Future took place in The Hague. We had 85 participants from 25 different countries represented by managers from prison and probation services, academics, researchers and legal professionals. The conference key note speakers presented on the causes and purposed of punishment; on the impact of prison architecture and design. The five project partners presented their views on recent developments and future trends. In parallel workshops the conference participants discussed criminal justice issues related to innovative (non) prison options such as alternative sanctions, new prison concepts, perspectives of offenders and/or citizens, the abolition of prisons as a last resort and the professional development of prison and probation services.

WHO: Violence and Injury Prevention -Applications for MENTOR-VIP open until 6 May 2016

WHO's global mentoring programme, MENTOR-VIP, is designed to assist junior injury prevention practitioners to develop specific skills through structured collaboration with a more experienced person who has volunteered to act as a mentor. Since its inception in 2007, more than 70 mentorships on a range of violence and injury topics have been undertaken. Recent collaborations include: • Review and situation analysis of poisoning; development of an intervention strategy or plan for poisoning prevention in Bangladesh; • Hospital-based bedside counselling to prevent child injury in China; • Study of pedestrian knowledge, attitudes and behaviour around a busy highway in India; • Gap/problem analysis of a national injury surveillance system and improvements to surveillance system design and implementation in Jamaica; • Literature review of child injury and application of Haddon's Matrix to case series in Pakistan; • Social acceptability of barriers to prevent drowning in children and publication of papers summarizing drowning prevention in the Philippines; • Linkage of data on road traffic injuries using police and hospital data and development of a policy brief in Romania; • Preparation of research proposal on psycho-social factors related to suicide in South Africa; • School area road safety assessments for primary school children in United Republic of Tanzania. MENTOR-VIP is an excellent opportunity for committed injury and violence prevention practitioners to improve their skills and benefit from the guidance of a more practiced mentor.

PhD scholarships for crime and security PhDs at UCL - apply now!

PhD scholarships and Open Evening for UCL Security Science Doctoral Training Centre (UCL SECReT) APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SCHOLARSHIPS IS APRIL 29TH 2016. UCL SECReT is the £17m international centre for PhD training in security and crime science at University College London, the first centre of its kind in Europe. We offer the most comprehensive integrated PhD programme for students wishing to pursue multidisciplinary security or crime-related research degrees. We recruit our doctoral students from a range of scientific backgrounds to pursue research in crime or security domains across the engineering and social sciences. Students can enter through various funding routes (self-funded, industry sponsors, scholarships).

Stockholm Criminology Symposium April 2016: Preliminary program is available

A preliminary program is now available on the symposium website. You will be able to listen to around 200 speakers who will present their research and experiences in around 50 sessions.

UNICEF’s 13th Innocenti Report Card: Fairness for Children. Fighting inequality from the bottom end

The global chorus of concern about rising inequality seems focused on the accumulation of wealth at the very top. While this is a serious problem requiring urgent attention, it can distract attention from the devastating, and arguably more dangerous dynamics of inequality at the bottom of the distribution. This is where inequality seriously diminishes the life chances of the most vulnerable children, now and in the future. When we turn our attention to “bottom-end” inequality – the gap between the lowest 10 per cent and the median – we get a picture of how the most disadvantaged in society are falling further away from the promise of a decent life in the middle. Here is where UNICEF’s 13th Innocenti Report Card: Fairness for Children is urging political leaders in the industrialized world to turn their attention. The message is stark: as inequality increases, wealthy nations of the world are failing their children at the bottom. Those with the least ability to narrow the gaps are being allowed to fall further behind. In about half the rich countries of the world more than 10 per cent of children at the bottom have access to less than 50 per cent of the mid-level income. In 3 out of 4 rich countries bottom end income gaps have remained stagnant or widened since 2008. Each Report Card creates an important moment when UNICEF turns its attention to vulnerable children in the developed world. It’s League Tables tally up performance and deliver grades to 41 EU and OECD countries. Call it a gimmick, often it focuses powerful minds on children, fast. But rankings also accomplish a more substantial task. They allow us to compare where countries have fared well or poorly, and this underscores the truth that child inequality is not inevitable, but policy susceptible. When children go without they absorb damage immediately but the effects can resonate across their lives. Differences based on merit cannot reasonably be defended as the social and economic circumstances children face are beyond their control. No child should be allowed to suffer inequities in early years that can undermine lifelong well-being. By looking at inequality solely through the lens of income, other critical dimensions of child well-being can be missed. In addition to income, Fairness for Children tracks how far children at the bottom are falling behind their peers in educational attainment, self-reported health and life satisfaction. This comprehensive approach essentially creates a 3D image of inequality. A necessary step, as it is quite possible for a child to live in a home with income at or above the median yet have educational achievement, for example, far below the median. This is precisely the case for children in the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden and France. The big message from Fairness for Children is the fight against growing inequality should also include strategies to push the bottom 10 per cent upward. More than just a good sense approach to increasing consumption capacity, this is the best way to protect all children from the consequences of inequity. The bottom up approach may also be the most cost effective way to fight the worst ravages of inequality. As Fairness for Children outlines, the most effective strategies involve simple, low-cost measures such as targeting social support to the poorest homes, making schools more supportive, encouraging healthy lifestyles and taking children’s sense of their own life satisfaction seriously.

AIC: Responding to unruly airline passengers: The Australian context

Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 510 Susan Goldsmid, Georgina Fuller, Sarah Coghlan & Rick Brown ISSN 1836-2206 Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, April 2016 Unruly passenger incidents have received considerable media attention over the past few years. Unruly passengers are those whose demeanour, behaviour or failure to comply with cabin crew directions present a threat to the safety or security of the aircraft and/or those on board. Australian airlines respond to and manage a small but consistent number of unruly passenger incidents every year. Specific strategies implemented by the airlines, the Australian Federal Police and government and regulatory bodies have focused on minimising the occurrence of and risks associated with these incidents. Despite this, unruly passenger incidents continue to occur, with ramifications for the safety and security of the crew, passengers and aircraft. In June 2015, the Australian Institute of Criminology hosted a roundtable to discuss unruly passenger incidents. Participants included Australian airlines, the police, and other government and regulatory agencies involved in aviation security. This paper draws on both international literature and the roundtable discussions to identify issues related to the identification and management of unruly passenger incidents and the minimisation of associated safety and security risks.

Webinar: Protecting the Fair Housing Rights of People with Criminal Records

Hosted by the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law and the Vera Institute of Justice Register for this webinarDate: Thursday, April 28 Time: 2:00–3:30 p.m. EST "Millions of Americans—a disproportionate number of whom are people of color—have criminal records that can be a barrier to housing. In celebration of National Reentry Week, the Shriver Center and the Vera Institute of Justice will host a webinar on fair housing rights for people with criminal records. Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued groundbreaking guidance stating that admission denials, evictions, and other adverse housing decisions based on a person’s criminal record may constitute racial discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. Featuring the head of HUD’s Office of Public and Indian Housing, this webinar will give an overview of recent guidance issued by HUD, including the Shriver Center’s 2015 report that HUD offered as a resource to public housing authorities. It will also cover examples of best practices across the country, such as a pilot program to reunite families in New York City and an innovative way of screening in New Orleans."

Webinar: Responding to the Second Chance Act Smart Reentry Solicitation

Hosted by National Reentry Resource Center with funding support from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance Register for this webinarWhen: Wednesday, May 4 Time: 2–3:30 p.m. ET In this webinar, officials from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and the National Reentry Resource Center will explain the Second Chance Act (SCA) Smart Reentry Solicitation and how state and local government agencies and federally recognized Indian tribal governments can apply for funding. BJA’s “Smart Suite” of programs, which includes the Smart Reentry Program, invests in the development of practitioner-researcher partnerships that use data, evidence, and innovation to help create effective criminal justice strategies and interventions. Having a data-driven approach can enable jurisdictions to understand the full nature and extent of the criminal justice challenges they face and prioritize their resources.

Fully-Funded Study Opportunity: 2016 ACUNS/ASIL Workshop

SUPPORTING STATES’ IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ACUNS is accepting applications for a fully-funded* study opportunity Essential Information Where: O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India When: October 1-12, 2016 Application Deadline: Monday, May 9, 2016 Download the Workshop Flyer *The selected participants will receive lowest-cost economy class return air travel between their location and the workshop site, accommodations and some meals for the duration of the workshop. Program Theme & Policy Relevance In the famous expression of Louis Henkin, “almost all nations observe almost all principles of international law and almost all of their obligations almost all of the time” (Louis Henkin, How Nations Behave 1979). Governments comply with international law not simply – or even primarily – because of the threat of sanctions, but for many other reasons: because they consider compliance to be in their national interests; they think this is the moral thing to do; they want to maintain friendly relations with other states; and because they don’t like to be the subject of international criticism for failing to do so. When states do not comply with international law, this might not be because of malign intentions and bad faith, but also because of lack of information or lack of capacity to comply. How can or should other states and the international community deal with governments of states that are willing, but unable to comply? What facilitation mechanisms and processes, what forms of support and incentive, can be envisaged to assist and encourage states in the implementation of international law? At the ACUNS 2016 Workshop on International Organization Studies, ACUNS and Jindal Global University look forward to engaging with young scholars and practitioners on identifying and defining the limitations of imposing sanctions, and whether facilitating the implementation of international law through specific measures and mechanisms may offer an alternative model. Learning Objectives Participants in the workshop will gain scholarly and practice-based knowledge and applied skills in the analysis of a number of issue areas related to the workshop theme. In some measure, the specific issue areas will be determined by the research proposals of the selected participants, but more broadly the themes and skill-sets to be addressed may be anticipated to include (but not be limited to): • Achieving strategic coherence between the political, security, development and human rights dimensions of peace operations; • Managing and balancing the roles and interests of actors at the local, national, regional and global levels, including intergovernmental, non-governmental, and civil society parties, and across military and civilian policy sectors; • The current state of knowledge regarding ideas and norms, policies, doctrine and practices, strengths and deficiencies, needs and resources, and ‘lessons learned’ related to UN peacekeeping and Special Political Missions; • Identifying and reflecting upon the ‘lessons learned’ from the sharing of innovative proposals, ideas, and practices, between and among the next generation of scholars and practitioners, and how these best might be used to promote positive policy outcomes. Workshop Benefits Through presentations by young scholars and practitioners (that is you!), case studies, guided research, special lectures and innovative pedagogies geared towards post-graduate level professionals, this workshop will encourage participants to improve their own skills and capacities for engaging constructively at different stages and in varying environments in the complex but critical areas of scholarship and practice in contemporary global peace operations. Application Procedure Scholars in international relations and international law, and from other fields relevant to the workshop e.g. development, international public policy; and practitioners from NGOs and government institutions in all countries are encouraged to apply. Applications are due Monday, May 9, 2016, and must include all of the following: • A brief (~1,000 words) statement of research interests apropos of the workshop themes • Your curriculum vitae • One letter of reference • Application Form

Criminalising conversations: Australia’s damaging love affair with consorting laws

February 7, 2016 7.07pm GMT . Author: Terry Goldsworthy Consorting laws have been introduced under the pretext of combating organised crime – including that committed by bikie gangs. AAP/Joe Castro

UNODC: New campaign on science-based drug prevention calls for people to #ListenFirst

19 April 2016 - Under the slogan 'Listen First' a new campaign on science-based drug prevention has been launched to raise awareness around listening to children and youth as the first step to help them grow healthy and safe. The campaign targets parents, teachers, policy makers, health worker and prevention workers particularly, as well as the wider public. The global campaign - using the hashtag #ListenFirst - aims to increasing support for science-based drug use prevention. In order to illustrate this important issue to a diverse audience, a powerful new Public Service Announcement has been developed. The video highlights how paying attention and reacting to children's needs can help preventing them from risky behaviours and drug use.

UNODC: #ADeadlyBusiness Campaign, drawing attention to the plight of smuggled migrants, presented at OAS

Operating across a variety of countries and utilizing a range of legal and illegal methods, migrant smuggling generates thousands of dollars for criminal organizations, who profit from people's vulnerability. UNODC's office in Mexico recently presented its latest awareness raising campaign on this crime - #ADeadlyBusiness.